165 results for 'cat:"Evidence" AND cat:"Negligence"'.
J. Lobrano finds that the city court properly awarded damages to a shopper who suffered a slip and fall in a market. The market had constructive notice of the green pepper that the shopper slipped on because the video evidence shows that the pepper fell from another shopper’s basket and remained on the floor for over 15 minutes. The video also shows an employee looking at her smart watch and not being busy with customers directly before the fall happened. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Lobrano, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 2023-CA-0587, Categories: evidence, negligence
J. Byrne finds the lower court properly applied the "primary-assumption-of-risk" doctrine and granted the motions for summary judgment filed by the daycare and swimming pool. the risk of drowning at the pool was voluntarily assumed by the child and his parents when he swam during a trip with his daycare class. Although the daycare did not communicate its "swimmers" and "non-swimmers" wristband policy to lifeguards when its children arrived at the pool, this did nothing to increase the risk of drowning, especially considering the lifeguards could not see the child's wristband and he was in the proper, shallow end of the pool when he went underwater. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Byrne, Filed On: May 6, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1726, Categories: evidence, negligence
J. Jolivette Brown denies summary judgment to a New Orleans hotel on its argument the litigant’s claims for monetary damages are barred by state law because he was sentenced to 37 months in prison for being a convicted felon in possession of a handgun in connection with the shooting death of an armed hotel parking valet. Genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether the deceased valet had the right to use reasonable force during the incident. Furthermore, the litigant's claims of negligence, assault, battery and false imprisonment will not be dismissed for non-participation in discovery since he is involuntarily incarcerated.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Louisiana , Judge: Jolivette Brown, Filed On: May 2, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv1764, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: evidence, Damages, negligence
J. Wicker finds that the trial court properly dismissed a plaintiff's driver's claim against the defendant driver in a three car collision. In this case, the defendant driver testified that he was hit from behind by a third driver and that the impact caused his car to hit the plaintiff driver's car. The police report indicated minimum damage to the front of the defendant driver's car, supporting that he was pushed into plaintiff's car, and the photographic evidence shows a strong impact between the third driver's car and the defendant driver's car. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Wicker, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-489, Categories: evidence, Tort, negligence
J. Windhorst finds that the trial court properly found for the parish on a pedestrian's claim that he fell into an improperly maintained manhole up to his hips. The parish did not have constructive knowledge about the dangerous condition of the manhole because three days after the incident, a parish employee inspected the manhole and found nothing unusual about it. Also, the parish had no prior work orders for the manhole cover, and there was no history of injuries involving the manhole cover. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Windhorst, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-498, Categories: evidence, negligence
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Ervin-Knott finds that the trial court should not have found for a hotel on a guest's negligence action after he was injured in a robbery in the hotel parking area. Although the hotel presented evidence to show that there was no prior criminal activity in the parking area, there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding the foreseeability of criminal activity. In this case, the location, nature, and condition of the hotel were not taken into account. This court has repeatedly found that a lack of prior criminal acts at a certain place does not automatically render a crime unforeseeable. Further, the guest testified to New Orleans' high crime rate at the time of the incident, and the lack of a manager or hotel workers in the lobby at the time of the robbery. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Ervin-Knott, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 2023-CA-0731, Categories: evidence, negligence
J. Robinson finds that the trial court should not have granted a partial finding for the plaintiff driver on the issue of causation of injury. The evidence presented did not show that the plaintiff driver was in good health prior to the accident and was insufficient to show that no genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the accident caused the injury. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Robinson, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 55,211-CA, Categories: evidence, negligence
J. Stevens reverses, in part, the trial court’s order of parental termination rights related to three children who were found living with their drug-using mother in a U-Haul van, then placed in the custody of the father, who is now incarcerated for child endangerment after the kids tested positive for methamphetamine abuse. The state’s family service plan was not filed into the trial court’s record or the appellate record and, therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support the mother's failure to comply with the plan. Furthermore, there is no evidence to support the state’s assertions the mother did not complete a drug abuse program or that she continued using drugs after completing such a program. Reversed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Stevens, Filed On: April 19, 2024, Case #: 06-23-97, Categories: evidence, Family Law, negligence
J. Abele finds that the lower court properly granted the board of commissioners' motion for summary judgment. It did not breach its duty of care to the residents whose home was damaged by a sewer backup that developed quickly and was unclogged nearly as soon as the city became aware of the issue. Although the sewer line had become clogged in the past, the residents presented no evidence the city knew of any deterioration or defects that would have required it to take preventive action before another clog developed, and so it cannot be held responsible for property damage. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Abele, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1569, Categories: evidence, Government, negligence
J. Landau finds the lower court properly found in favor of a bounce house company in this matter of alleged negligence. A child fractured his leg while jumping in an inflatable bounce house at a birthday party. A parent of the child filed suit against the bounce house company claiming it was negligent because it did not have a trained attendant at the party to supervise the use of the bounce house, but provided no evidence to show that supervision by the company would have prevented any injury. The instant court finds no error in the lower court’s decision to dismiss. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Landau, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: 01-22-00898-CV, Categories: evidence, negligence
Per curiam, the Vermont Supreme Court finds the family court properly declared a child was in need of care or supervision. The parents argue on appeal there was no evidence to support the court’s statements and the best interest of the child is not appropriate. The evidence supports the court’s findings of a lack of parental care. Affirmed.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 5, 2024, Case #: 23-AP-366, Categories: evidence, Family Law, negligence
Per curiam, the Vermont Supreme Court finds the family court properly declared two children were in need of care or supervision. The parents argue on appeal there was no evidence to support the court’s statements and there is no harm because they live in poverty. The children were found, “without proper parental care or subsistence, education, medical, or other care necessary for his or her well-being.” The evidence supports the court’s findings of a lack of parental care. Affirmed.
Court: Vermont Supreme Court, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 5, 2024, Case #: 23-AP-372, Categories: evidence, Family Law, negligence
J. Graves finds the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Michaels. The customer brought this negligence suit after slipping and falling inside the store on a rainy day. The customer's declaration, photos, testimony, as well as a security video not showing the area where the customer slipped, did not create a genuine dispute of material fact as to notice. A statement recounted by the customer from an unidentified staff member regarding how the staff had been mopping up water all day is hearsay. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Graves , Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 23-30393, Categories: evidence, negligence, Premises Liability
J. Gruber finds the circuit court properly found for the homeowners on an invitee's allegations the lack of a railing on the home's second floor balcony caused him to fall from the balcony, sustaining injuries. The invitee knew of the dangerous condition that caused his injury, and no evidence shown brings into question any material fact. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gruber, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: CV-22-202, Categories: evidence, Tort, negligence
J. Dysart finds that the district court should not have found for a hotel on a patron's slip and fall claim. In this case, there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether the mat the patron was walking on at the time of the accident was defective. A valet testified that there was a problem with the mat at the entrance and that he had discussed the mat with a hotel employee on a previous occasion. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Dysart, Filed On: April 2, 2024, Case #: 2023-CA-0589, Categories: evidence, negligence
J. Massa finds that the trial court properly ruled in negligence claims concerning spoiled evidence because the insurance company failed to demonstrate defendant had a duty to preserve a dehydrator as potential trial evidence. Affirmed.
Court: Indiana Supreme Court, Judge: Massa, Filed On: April 2, 2024, Case #: 23S-CT-272, Categories: evidence, negligence
J. Marcel finds that the trial court properly found for a homeowner who sued a dog owner for negligence after she was bitten by the dog while the dog owner was walking by her home. The homeowner testified that the dog bit her during an altercation with the homeowner's dog through a small hole in the fence. Further, the homeowner testified that the injury led to multiple surgical interventions and caused residual impairments to her finger. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Marcel, Filed On: March 28, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-373, Categories: evidence, negligence
J. Schlegel finds that the trial court should not have granted a neighbor's exception of prescription on a property owner's claim filed on September 13, 2022, that his house was damaged when the neighbor's tree fell on it during a hurricane. In this case, although the homeowner's petition references Hurricane Ida making landfall on or about August 29, 2021, the petition does not actually allege a specific date when the tree fell and damaged his property. Further, the neighbor did not introduce evidence as to when the damage occurred. The undisputed evidence shows that the homeowner did not return to his home until September 17, 2021, after evacuating before the hurricane made landfall. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Schlegel, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-408, Categories: evidence, Property, negligence
J. Emas finds the trial court did not err by granting the citizen's motion to amend her complaint to add a claim for punitive damages in her lawsuit against the motorist who backed into her in a parking lot and pinned her between two cars, causing injuries requiring surgery. Despite varying accounts given from witnesses, there was an evidentiary basis to allow the citizen to add her claim for punitive damages because, she asserts, the motorist was drunk at the time of the incident. Affirmed.
Court: Florida Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Emas, Filed On: March 27, 2024, Case #: 23-0639, Categories: evidence, Damages, negligence
Per curiam, the appellate court finds that the trial court should not have excluded medical records a plaintiff driver produced after the expiration of the discovery deadline and shortly before the first trial date. In this case, due to no fault of the parties, the trial was continued for several months, allowing ample time for additional discovery. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: March 22, 2024, Case #: 24-C-21, Categories: evidence, negligence, Discovery
J. Contreras finds that the lower court improperly granted summary judgment to the defendant store in this premises liability lawsuit alleging that a shopper was injured when she "slipped and fell on some water." The lower court erred in excluding certain expert testimony, specifically regarding the store's maintenance of the roof and its efforts to "contain the leak." Additionally, there are fact issues remaining for the jury. Reversed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Contreras, Filed On: March 21, 2024, Case #: 13-23-00205-CV, Categories: evidence, negligence, Experts
J. England grants, in part, Walmart’s motion for summary judgment in this slip-and-fall case brought by a customer claiming of negligence and wantonness. The customer argues that Walmart the broken tile should have been discovered by employees as it was part of the premises creating a hazard. Her testimony and evidence support the defect, the piece of tile was present and the reason for her fall. Therefore, the wantonness claim is dismissed and the remaining claim for negligence is denied. The parties are ordered to confer and file a joint status report regarding the next steps.
Court: USDC Northern District of Alabama , Judge: England, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: 2:22cv643, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: evidence, negligence, Premises Liability
J. Marcel finds that the trial court properly dismissed a customer's slip and fall action over an incident in a market. The video surveillance footage shows two tall yellow warning cones placed close to the center of the aisle next to the frozen food cooler where the fall took place. Further, the patron can be seen maneuvering his shopping cart around the cones immediately before the fall. Therefore, the market took reasonable precautions to warn patrons of the potentially hazardous wet floor. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Marcel, Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-227, Categories: evidence, negligence